Recent Press

 
Press Release:  PORSCHE TOP RANKED; BMW AND MINI MOST IMPROVED FOR RESPONSE TO CUSTOMER INTERNET INQUIRIES, REPORTS PIED PIPER PSI®

Press Release: PORSCHE TOP RANKED; BMW AND MINI MOST IMPROVED FOR RESPONSE TO CUSTOMER INTERNET INQUIRIES, REPORTS PIED PIPER PSI®

March 2016

  • Industry average performance shows no improvement over three years
  • Half of customers received response within 30 minutes; but every 11th customer received no response within 24 hours

Monterey, California – March 7, 2016 –  Porsche dealerships ranked highest in the 2016 Pied Piper PSI® Internet Lead Effectiveness() (ILE™) Benchmarking Study, which  measured how auto dealerships responded to customer inquiries received over the internet.  BMW and MINI dealerships were the most improved brands compared to the previous year.  Study rankings by brand were determined by the patent-pending Pied Piper PSI process, which ties “mystery shopping” measurement and scoring to dealership sales success.

Industry average performance has failed to improve over the past three years and dropped slightly from 2015 to 2016, with 21 of 33 brands declining.  For 2016 dealers responded to half of the customer inquiries within 30 minutes, but one customer in eleven failed to receive a response of any type within 24 hours. 

Pied Piper first measured dealership response to customer internet inquiries in 2008, and back then not every brand or dealership appreciated the importance of internet inquiries.  Eight years later in 2016 everyone accepts that customer internet inquiries are critical to success, but given that importance, why aren’t all of today’s dealership responses quick and complete?  “There are three reasons for poor performance,” said Fran O’Hagan, President and CEO of Pied Piper Management Company LLC.  “First of all, this is a part of the business that’s invisible to management unless management is vigilant and pays attention to what is really happening.  Secondly, it’s not easy to be perfect every hour of every day, with customer inquiries never falling through the cracks.  And third, we often see failures of third-party CRM software, and these failures are usually invisible to the client.” 

Substantial differences between brands remain.  Not only is there variation in today’s performance, but also in how that performance has changed over time.  For example, only six brands have improved their performance every year for the past three years: Acura, BMW, Chevrolet, Ford, MINI and Mitsubishi. 

Among the largest manufacturers in the 2016 study, Ford was ranked highest, with Toyota, Honda and Nissan close behind, all above the industry average.   

  • Ford and Lincoln have performed well above the industry average for the past three years, with Ford the top-scoring non-luxury brand in 2016. 
  • Toyota has finished at or above the industry average for the past three years, and Lexus has finished not only above average, but at or near the top of the industry.
  • Honda and Acura have performed above the industry average for the past three years. 
  • Nissan and Infiniti have been close to the industry average for the past three years and both finished above the average in 2016. 
  • Fiat Chrysler Automobiles brands dipped below the industry average this year after performing above average in 2014 and 2015.
  • All General Motors brands performed below the industry average in 2016 as all have done for the past two years, and all but Buick for the past three years. 

Among top-scoring brands, there were interesting differences in the approaches followed by their dealers.  For example, dealers for number two ranked brand, Lexus, usually responded quickly by email and answered a customer’s specific question 69% of the time, but attempted to follow-up by telephone only 20% of the time.  In contrast, dealers for the number four ranked brand, Ford, who also responded quickly by email, answered the customer’s specific question by email only 21% of the time, but the Ford dealers attempted to follow-up by telephone 70% of the time.

» View PDF of Article (440.7 KB) PDF Document

Site Navigation
Printed: April 27, 2024

All information contained within these documents is based upon patent-pending and/or proprietary methodology belonging to or licensed by Pied Piper Management Company, LLC and usage is subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Retailer Participation and License Agreement or other Agreements. Your acceptance of this information implies your consent to keep its contents private. © 2024 Pied Piper Management Company, LLC.